Article in San Diego Union Tribune

The San Diego Union Tribune published an article on our work at the South Bay Salt Works, part of the larger NASA-funded OAST project. Check it out here: https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/environment/story/2019-11-05/seeking-life-in-the-solar-system.

Salt flat research
Measuring salinity at the South Bay Salt Works (John Gibbins/The San Diego Union-Tribune)
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Antarctic ecosystem services paper published

We have a new paper published this week in Frontiers in Environmental Science on estimating ecosystem services along the western Antarctic Peninsula (WAP). This was one of the most challenging academic efforts I’ve been involved in, and is the culmination of nearly 5 years of effort since co-author Barbara Neumann and I conceived the idea during a serendipitous meeting at a Columbia-Kiel University workshop on marine science back when we were both postdocs.

Ecosystem services, the direct and indirect contributions of ecosystems to human well-being, is a concept that’s received a lot of attention as a critical abstraction at the interface between science and policy. Scientists have gotten very good at understanding ecosystem processes and relating them to other ecosystem processes. Economists and social scientists are getting better at quantifying the social and economic costs of environmental change. What’s frequently missing, however, is a framework for linking specific ecosystem processes to social or economic outcomes. This becomes really important if you want to effectively manage resource use; ecosystems perceived as being more socially and economically valuable (i.e. providing more ecosystem services), for example, might warrant more nuanced management.

Ecosystem services are most useful when we can consider their distribution in space and time. However, linking ecosystem services to specific places and times is methodologically challenging. One way to do this is to use expert elicitations via the matrix method. In this approach a collection of experts is formally interviewed in a consistent, scripted fashion to identify “consensus” estimates of service supply from specific ecological units. This approach is typically applied to landscapes, where the ecological units are geographically fixed (think about a mosaic of forest and grassland, each providing different services, but fixed in space).

From Jacobs et al., 2015. Expert based estimates of ecosystem service apply can be mapped to ecological with a known spatial distribution, yielding a spatial map of ecosystem service supply.

But what about the marine environment? Certain ecological features, such as a shoal, gyre, or recurrent eddy can be geographically fixed, but away from such features the marine environment is a fluid mosaic that is not fixed in time or space. We decided to try an approach that was agnostic to location, and instead elicited expert opinions of service supply from the seascape units derived from an objective analysis of macronutrients, chlorophyll, temperature, and salinity in Bowman et al., 2018.

From Neumann et al., 2019. The distribution of objective defined seascape units at different depths along the central west coast of the Antarctic Peninsula. Bowman et al. 2018 identified a total of 8 seascape units that varied in time and space, though most exhibited a tendency toward a certain depth range or location along the onshore-offshore gradient.

For our group of experts we tapped the investigators of the Palmer Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) project (many thanks to all of you!). It was quite a challenge to reconcile the divergent methods – when we conducted the interviews we hadn’t worked out all the details of the seascape unit classification system – but we got there in the end. The approach could use some further refinement before it’s ready to produce a data product for resource managers, however, we hope the proof-of-concept will stimulate further effort at LTERs and elsewhere in the marine environment!

From Neumann et al., 2019. Service supply categorizations for tradition, “landscape” based service providing units and objectively defined seascape units, derived from expert elicitations from the Palmer LTER investigators.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

MOSAiC is go!

From the tropics to the Arctic… I spent last week in Tromsø , Norway helping prepare the German icebreaker Polarstern for the MOSAiC year-long polar drift expedition. As I’ve written in past posts, I’ve been waiting for this moment since 2012 and it’s hard to believe it’s finally here. MOSAiC is a true coupled ocean-ice-atmosphere study, and the first such study of its scope or scale. There have been modern overwintering expeditions in the Arctic before – most notably the SHEBA expedition of the late 1990’s – but none have approached the breadth or scale of MOSAiC.

The start of the MOSAiC expedition in Tromsø, Norway.

The basic idea behind MOSAiC is to drive Polarstern into the Laptev Sea and tether the ship to an (increasingly rare) large floe of multiyear sea ice. As we move toward winter, the floe and Polarstern will become encased in newly forming sea ice. The ship will drift with this ice through the full cycle of seasons, allowing a rare opportunity to study the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of sea ice through its full progression of growth and decay.

The German icebreaker Polarstern tethered to an ice floe in the Arctic. Image from https://www.mosaic-expedition.org/expedition/drift/.

But MOSAiC is about more than sea ice. Sea ice is – for now – a dominant ecological feature of the central Arctic, and it exerts a strong influence on both the atmosphere and the upper ocean. Better predicting the consequences of reduced sea ice cover on these environments is a major goal of the expedition.

With support from the National Science Foundation, for our own little piece of MOSAiC PhD student Emelia Chamberlain and I are collaborating with Brice Loose and postdoctoral researcher Alessandra D’Angelo at the University of Rhode Island, along with colleagues from the Alfred Wegener Institute in Germany. We’ll be looking at how the structure of prokaryotic and eukaryotic communities in sea ice and the upper ocean influence the oxidation of methane (a potent greenhouse gas), and the production and uptake of CO2. I’m looking forward to joining Polarstern in late January for a long, cold stint at the end of the polar night!

Our lab on Polarstern.
We searched in Tromsø for a totem for the lab, but ran a bit short on time and settled for Igor. Trolls are troublesome creatures and not, I think, particularly emblematic of our project team. Cavity ring-down spectrometers and mass specs, however, can be a bit trollish at times. So the totem is for them. Igor will be in charge of our little group of instruments. We can direct our frustrations at him, and hopefully by placating him with offerings we can keep things running smoothly.
The Akademik Federov, a Russian research icebreaker that will sail with Polarstern and help establish the drifting observatory. Federov will return in a few weeks.
Dancing on ice floes. The MOSAiC launch was quite an event with lectures, a party, and a hi-tech light show. The show included an interactive ice floe field – step on the floes and they crack to become open water, slowly freezing after you pass. It was well done.
It’s the Polarstern projected on the Polarstern. So meta.
And they’re off! waving good-bye to the Polarstern.
Posted in MOSAiC | Leave a comment

Cayapas-Mataje Redux

Natalia Erazo and I are on our way back from an amazing week of sampling in the Cayapas-Mataje Ecological Reserve in northern Ecuador. We first visited the reserve in 2017 and have been anxious to return ever since. Our objectives on this trip were to collect water column and sediment samples to test hypotheses about how shrimp aquaculture impacts mangrove forest health and biogeochemical cycling in mangrove-dominated estuaries. Cayapas-Mataje is an ideal place for this study. The reserve is the largest of its kind along the Pacific Coast of Latin America. The presence of the reserve has prevented the large-scale conversion of mangrove forest to shrimp aquaculture (as has happened further south in Muisne and other parts of the country), however, there are a number of facilities – some quite large – that existed prior to the establishment of the reserve. Thus relatively “pristine” forest can be found immediately adjacent highly impacted forest.

Congratulations to Natalia for receiving a National Geographic Young Explorer award to make this trip a reality! Here are a few choice pictures from the week.

Making a plan. Jesse (blue hat) was our guide in 2017. This trip we were lucky to be joined by Santos, a local fisherman with deep knowledge of the area.
Tambillo. Best village in Cayapas-Mataje.
Bringing the coconuts to market.
You don’t see many dugout canoes in Cayapas-Mataje, though I understand that they’re more common among the indigenous villagers up-river.
Shrimp farm in Cayapas-Mataje. So much nitrogen…
Measuring tree height. Some of the mangroves in Cayapas-Mataje are so high that you wouldn’t believe it if I told you how high (64 meters).
Crabs. Ecologically important. Very camera shy.
Natalia with Jesse’s boat “Los Reyes del Manglar” (The Kings of the Mangroves)
Santos with cockles. Cayapas-Mataje supports a major artisinal cockle fishery (see here).
It’s a jungle…
Where’s Natalia?
After a hard days work.
Borbón, our home for the week. Town motto: We make every night an all-night dance party because we can!
Sampling in the mangroves.
Mangroves!
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sentinel North International PhD School